Rise And Rise Again
Great things can happen when you least expect it.
The summer blockbuster season of 2011 is drawing to an end. Most of the offerings this year have been frustratingly lacklustre. All that’s left is the month of August, traditionally a dumping ground for projects that studios have little faith in, or want to move out of the way to avoid being crushed by pirates, superheroes, boy wizards and shape-shifting robots at the box office. “Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes” is a prequel nobody asked for, based on a franchise hardly anybody of this generation is familiar with. Yet it is without a doubt the best film of the summer. I sure didn’t see this coming.
Being a film geek, I have a long-standing affection for the old “Apes” movies, even though they were made way before my time. 1968’s “Planet Of The Apes”, based on the novel by Pierre Boulle is a true genre classic. That infamous shock ending is now an iconic, endlessly referenced part of pop culture. Its four sequels never hit the same heights, though a couple of them shared the original’s deliciously nihilistic view of humanity. What really drove the final nail into the franchise’s coffin was a horribly misguided remake by Tim Burton in 2001. It’s taken a whole decade for the bad aftertaste to subside. Still, Twentieth Century Fox felt they hadn’t milked this cash cow completely dry. Burton’s travesty actually managed to turn a tidy profit. So here we are today with a new “Apes” movie. Sometimes, corporate greed yields unexpected benefits.
I’d like to believe this new film wasn’t motivated solely by financial gain. The smartest thing Fox ever did was to hire Rupert Wyatt to direct, along with Rick Jaffa & Amanda Silver to write the script. Englishman Wyatt had only one other feature-length film under his belt, low-budget indie “The Escapist”. At face value, he wouldn’t seem right for the job of marshalling a big-budget visual effects showcase. But all the strengths of “Rise” were already present and correct in his debut work: strong characterisation, solid writing, and a sense of restraint that comes not just from budgetary limitations but an understanding that sometimes, in order to get a point across, less is more. Michael Bay, please take note. When given US$93 million to play with, Wyatt still displays admirable restraint. He knows that at the end of the day, if you don’t care about your characters, all the flash and bang in the world won’t save your movie.
Which isn’t to say “Rise” doesn’t have the visual dazzle required for a summer sci-fi flick. This is CGI at its very best, wowing with you with a how-the-hell-did-they-do-that flair, while never losing sight of the most important rule. Visual effects, like any other filmmaking tool, are meant to help filmmakers tell a story. For a guy who’s never worked with effects on such a scale, Wyatt sure knows how to make it work. The fully-digital apes, with chimpanzee protagonist Caesar at the forefront, have been stunningly brought to life by WETA Studios. There is a genuine spark in Caesar’s eyes — the light of the soul, if you will. It’s an amazing achievement, and shows how far we’ve come technologically since Gollum, which was already a major milestone back then. The ape animation isn’t perfect, mind you. A couple of shots here and there look slightly unfinished. But that’s almost irrelevant. Because once we get into the story, we believe 100% in these characters. And we care. I don’t think I’ve seen a movie this year that moved me as much as this. The emotions here are very well-judged. They never veer into overwrought, manipulative sentimentality. Instead, every moment of pity, compassion or heartbreak is honestly earned. Wyatt has a knack for finding these feelings in small character beats, like a simple look or gesture.
The lion’s share of credit must go to Andy Serkis. He plays Caesar through the magic of real-time performance-capture technology, where sensors on his face and body are read by the computer and translated into his primate avatar onscreen. Which means every expression, every twitch, every subtle shift in posture that Serkis does becomes Caesar’s. It goes way beyond pantomime, as Serkis invests his chimp character with an incredible depth and breadth of personality. It’s not an obvious, black & white characterisation either. There are times where you sympathise with Caesar, and others where you fear him, or even doubt his real motives. Sometimes all within a single scene. The film industry is currently rife with talk of giving Serkis his long-overdue Oscar nomination. Caesar might be the one to finally persuade the Academy, who’ve foolishly refused to acknowledge performance-capture as “real” acting.
Surprisingly, other ape characters are pretty well fleshed out too. Caesar grew up in comfort among humans and has no idea how apes in captivity really live, until he is thrown into an animal facility. There he discovers a world of cruelty and oppression, which plant in him the seeds of discontent, then rebellion. He also finds true kinship for the first time in his fellow inmates. There is Maurice the wise old circus orangutan, who communicates with Caesar via sign language. Amusingly, their conversations come with subtitles. Then there is the nasty alpha male chimp from whom Caesar learns the value of power and dominance. And finally Buck, a huge gorilla condemned to solitary confinement who becomes his most loyal follower after Caesar cleverly orchestrates his release. What’s so cool about these scenes is that they are completely dialogue-free. Yet the audience knows exactly what’s going on in the minds of the apes, just by their looks and actions. This is visual storytelling at its purest.
Caesar and the rest of the apes are so good to watch that the human cast pales in comparison. James Franco’s scientist Will Rodman is a little colourless, though that’s more due to his role being written primarily as a means to get the plot moving. To his credit, Franco shows urgency and conviction when it’s called for, and there is a sense of natural progression in his relationship with Caesar. The other actors are given far less to do, with the script relegating them to functional stereotypes like sympathetic good guys (Freida Pinto as Will’s girlfriend) or just-asking-for-it bad guys (Brian Cox, Tom Felton and David Oyelowo). None of them are terrible, and they serve their functions well enough to get the audience siding with the apes. John Lithgow fares the best as a once-brilliant man struck down by Alzheimer’s disease. I found his scenes with his son Will, and with Caesar, the most touching. It’s the emotional centre of the whole story.
In “Rise”, the apes gain super intelligence due to Will’s research into a cure for Alzheimer’s. Like all cautionary tales about man’s tinkering with nature, the best of intentions lead to disastrous results. The filmmakers clearly disapprove of animal testing in medical research. And who can argue with that stance? In the real world, that sort of horror goes on every single day. Although no one likes being preached to, it is refreshing to see a film that has something to say. All good science-fiction stories say something about the human condition, or serve as a mirror to reflect human nature. The 1968 film reflected Cold War paranoia and warned of mankind’s self-destructive tendencies. In 2011, our great fears are natural disasters and viral pandemics, two themes the film tackles in varying levels of metaphor. The ape uprising at the film’s climax could be read as the wrath of Mother Nature for our sins.
Taken solely on surface appeal however, “Rise” is still a fast-paced, engaging experience that rewards both newcomers as well as longtime fans. It never forgets that first and foremost, its duty is to entertain. It does have a few flaws. In an effort to keep the proceedings brisk, the film’s narrative occasionally resorts to shortcuts, some of which don’t really make sense when you stop to think about it. It also suffers from common prequelitis: the need to match up stuff with what we know of previous films. In this case, it involves an ability that wouldn’t be possible for Caesar, given his regular ape anatomy. I can overlook this because when it happens, the effect is quite shocking. Plus it serves the character and the story’s purpose, as the pivotal turning point in ape evolution. Where on paper it comes across as goofy, on screen it’s quite a powerful moment. To say any more would ruin the surprise.
That’s what “Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes” is all about. Pleasant surprises. Future viewings may not reveal this film to be a classic on par with the original, but that’s an impossible expectation anyway. What it is though, is a terrific restart to the franchise. Wyatt and team have given us something new without forsaking the old. A risky balancing act but they pulled it off with aplomb and a lot of heart.
Expect everybody to ask for more “Apes” now.










7 comments
pixargirl
August 12, 2011 @ 2:25 am
seeing as how you praised this movie about primates i will overlook the fact that the last time i posted you called me a monkey. *playful pout*
gwen10
August 13, 2011 @ 1:34 am
I went to see this movie based on the strength of your recommendation. I’m so glad I trust your taste because this movie did not disappoint. My boyfriend seemed just as surprised that it turned out so engaging. He has a little more knowledge about the franchise, but we’re proof that whether you know a lot or nothing about the prior films, this would still be an enjoyable watch.
The technology that brought Ceasar to life is amazing. He had far more soul and presence than some actual human actors we see today. I cant’t imagine how they will push this even further.
I like James Franco in this film. While he was a little flat (Oscars, anyone? haha) in some scenes, I appreciated how, even in just the first few mins of the film, he gets the audience to understand why he’s so committed to the project and accept why he does what he does. John Lithgow’s portrayal of the father was a great way yo legitimize Franco’s acting. Lithgow, for me, made Franco’s character so much richer.
Thanks for getting me to watch this.
Agent Frank
August 15, 2011 @ 3:19 pm
Hail Ceasar! Two thumbs up for this film! Looking forward to see more of Apes soon.
e-Lena
August 19, 2011 @ 9:19 pm
Only movies that move me so, would make me cry like a kid again. This, has to be one of those movies with little surprises that would move you so much, you never knew it was capable in pulling those emotional nerves. It serves as a great public awareness not to do testings on animals, because in many ways, they are just like us. how they’re sometimes more human than us (ie acid splasher..I think they should do testings on him instead), how they’re not to be kept in a zoo, but in the wild instead. Not sure how many rehab/ preservation centers would do something about their facilities after this film, but it does give people that wake up call, not to mess with the apes, and not to mess with nature as well. Some things are just meant to be, as roughly quoted by Freida Pinto, the lady who was with Will. forgot her character name. heh.
Overall, thumbs up for this film, a standing ovation as well, I was darn satisfied with this film, worth my money, considering the fact that I was actually trying hard not to spend too much this week so I could catch a decent movie after class, and I’ve never felt so great. I’m still so moved..by the CGI, the expression in Caesar’s face.. the actions, indeed a job well done. Though the whole “Caesar is home” line may sound a little cliche, but it hit the spot, it was like, yes, he is home, after fighting for their own rights.. shit, I can go on and on about this. that line, one simple line, made me flash back, from the start of the movie, till the end… totally awesome possum…
Wai
August 22, 2011 @ 5:21 pm
Thanks to all for your comments on Apes. I’ll go in turn…
pixargirl: How come you’re so smart for a monkey? Were you exposed to the ALZ-113 drug? Btw, humans are apes too, so don’t feel too offended, eh.
gwen10: I’m glad you trust my recommendations. After all, that is the purpose of Electroshadow: to be a reliable source of info and knowledge about film. And please tell your boyfriend he has good taste in movies (And ask him to read the site).
Agent Frank: Yeah, I do sincerely hope there will be sequels to this very deserving film. It will probably happen, since Apes is doing quite well at the Box Office.
e-Lena: Nice to hear you were touched by the movie as well. As for the issue of keeping animals in zoos, I feel a little differently about that versus animal testing. I believe that in the larger scheme of things, zoos do more good than harm. They cultivate a love and understanding of animals, especially in children. Also, compassion towards animals has been proven to have a strong positive influence on the overall personality of a developing child. Studies have shown they more often grow up to be caring, well-adjusted adults.
e-Lena
August 23, 2011 @ 3:49 pm
you mean, do more good than harm. Well, there is a difference between a zoo and a wildlife park or a rehabilitation center for animals to grow up. Though it does cultivate love and understanding of animals in children, but how would the animals feel being locked up in bars, when they’re meant to swing from tree to tree? just my thoughts about the zoo, esp zoo negara.
speaking of which, I just watched Zookeeper earlier this afternoon, it was pretty good, a lil bit of a cliche, but still had a good laugh. one of those, sit back, relax and enjoy kinda films.
Wai
August 30, 2011 @ 1:03 pm
e-Lena: the larger scheme of things I was referring to is not for the animals in zoos/parks, but for mankind. When people, especially young children learn to appreciate animals thanks to their exposure via zoos, it primes the future generations to be more considerate towards the other beings we share the planet with.
Movies like “Zookeeper” on the other hand, instill a deep hatred in me for the Hollywood system and the (barely) human studio executives who keep churning out garbage like this.
Leave A Reply
By submitting a comment you grant Electro Shadow a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate and irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin’s discretion. Your email is used for verification purposes only, it will never be shared.