Rate This Movie:
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.9/5 (8 votes cast)

MAD MAX: FURY ROAD

MadMax Rev1


I love it when a filmmaker gives it his all.

Absolutely everything that George Miller is as an artist, and every single ounce of his burning desire to wow the audience has been poured into the cinematic Molotov Cocktail that is “Mad Max: Fury Road”. And it is breathtaking to behold. Sometimes overwhelmingly so, but that is precisely the allure of the beautiful, lucid madness Miller’s orchestrated in his latest and unquestionably greatest effort.

Action filmmaking is often seen as a young man’s game, yet a 70-year-old has just proven otherwise. “Fury Road” does feel like a film made by some ambitious newcomer bursting with energy, ideas and something to prove, not by a veteran whose last big hit was a musical about tap-dancing cartoon penguins. Then again, a man with a body of work so wildly varied tends to confound expectations. Besides, action is not so much a venture for the young as it is for the brave. And at this point in his career Miller still dares to take chances creatively as if his life depends on it. He doesn’t believe in saving anything for the sequel either. It’s all or nothing right here & now, and it’s this attitude that informs the film’s delirious, over-the-top nature. It also means that even if the results aren’t always successful, they’re always spectacular. Fortunately, in this instance Miller’s boldness has paid off in both spectacular AND successful fashion.


MadMax Rev2


He’s had lots of practice. After all, this is his fourth trip to the post-apocalyptic genre he almost single-handedly originated back in 1979 (the ultra low-budget “Mad Max”). In a new adventure that’s more reboot than sequel, Tom Hardy has replaced Mel Gibson in the title role. That’s far from the only thing that’s changed. For one, Miller now has the luxury of a US$150 million budget, affording him a much bigger and more elaborate sandbox to play in. While the previous instalments had a scrappy, pieced-together quality that worked in the setting’s favour, they couldn’t escape feeling like a cheap production. There is no such problem with this film. Every single frame of “Fury Road” is gorgeous, especially when it showcases the stunning Namibian desert locations and the incredible production design. I’m not even exaggerating. You could literally freeze frame any given scene, print it out, and it’d make a great piece of wall art.

The key to this is Miller’s obsessive eye for detail and grand unifying vision. That vision may be utterly batshit insane — with flamethrower guitars, engine-worshipping suicide warriors, and a freakshow straight out of some S&M fetishist’s fever dream — but there is something strangely mesmerising about it all, and a certain internal logic beneath the chaos. Steering wheels as sacred objects? Chrome spray paint a mark of spiritual readiness? The sign of “The V8” (as in V-8 engines) replacing the sign of The Cross? In a depleted world where vehicles are worth more than human lives, it makes perfect sense.


MadMax Rev3


And Miller gives us vehicles that are truly worthy of adulation. From car/tank hybrids to porcupine dune buggies to Siamese twin Cadillac-monster trucks, these delightfully twisted Frankenstein-ian beasts are as much the stars of the show as the human cast themselves. They’re not just eye candy either. Miller and team do things with the vehicles that beggar belief. The best part is, they’re done for real. Apart from some CG sweetening, every impossible lunge to & from speeding cars, every outrageous maneuver and every earth-shattering crash is down to meticulous planning and some serious balls of steel. Putting real people in real situations gives this an air of danger no amount of digital trickery could ever simulate.

Beyond that, Miller knows that the best stunts in the world are useless if they’re not presented in a way that allows the audience to get into the thick of things. None of that shaky-cam nonsense here. This is a director who lives by the wisdom that “there is only one perfect place for the camera to be at any given moment”. To that end, he’s storyboarded the entire movie in exacting detail, figured out what works best for each and every shot, then engaged the services of Oscar-winning cinematographer John Seale to capture the mayhem with flawless clarity. The end result: thoroughly engrossing, jaw-dropping action.


FILM-MAX


Having the cast perform most of their own stunts helps to sell the authenticity of the action. This is probably the most physical of performances I’ve seen from Tom Hardy and Charlize Theron, not just because of all the running, jumping, driving, shooting, and fighting that they do. The film started out as one big storyboard long before there was a script, so you can imagine just how much of a visual experience this is. The side effect is that the actors don’t have a lot of dialogue, so the bulk of their acting is conveyed via body language and expressions.

Hardy in particular has a bigger challenge, with his character somewhat sidelined for the entire first act. Yet he eventually steps up to give Max a quietly dangerous, low-voltage intensity and the sense of a troubled man trying to pull himself together. It’s different from the Gibson original, so purists may sneer. But I think the real gift of what Hardy’s done here is that it leaves us feeling like there’s still lots more to Max than he is letting on.


MadMax Rev6


The other players are strong too, especially Hugh Keays-Byrne who puts the ARCH in arch-villain Immortan Joe. Mostly hidden behind a mask and heavy make-up, he still manages to get all theatrical and it fits the tone of the film like a glove. Then there’s Nicholas Hoult, who in some ways gets the most dramatically complete role. His character arc goes from unlikable to sympathetic over the course of the story, and Hoult pulls it off really well.

If Miller has us wanting more of Max, it’s also because he’s sneaked in Theron’s Imperator Furiosa as the real protagonist here. Theron is terrific, giving her character a steely, badass exterior to hide the remnants of humanity that the world around her seems hellbent on extinguishing. In fact, she is so badass to the point where she keeps upstaging Max. At first it may come off as an unsatisfying way of treating the title character, and I won’t deny that impression initially bothered me. But having had time to sit back and digest the film, I’ve come to the conclusion that Miller’s delivered one heck of a bold sucker punch, under the guise of blockbuster entertainment.


MadMax Rev5


This is a director intent on turning the entire notion of the Male Action Hero on its head. Granted, Mad Max is more of an anti-hero, but he still functions pretty much the way heroes do. Miller isn’t interested in playing by the same old traditions of the genre, where the leading man has all the cool moves, does all the rescuing, kills the bad guy, and gets the girl in the end. Almost none of that happens here, and that responsibility is instead carried by the leading lady. But why all this subverting of gender roles? Besides the obvious surprise element that makes this feel fresh amidst a genre full of worn-out cliches, Miller genuinely has something to say about the power dynamics between the sexes.

Alpha Male Immortan Joe has power and control over his followers but what he really craves is a legacy. To fulfill that he has a harem of beautiful “brides” to bear him genetically perfect heirs. These women have no power, except the ability to do the one thing he cannot. In comes Furiosa, who wrests control by rescuing his brides, thus depriving him of a future and therefore any lasting power. Also, while Joe is all about taking (both life and hope), the females in the film symbolise giving (ditto).


MadMax Rev7


There’s been some noise about this film being aggressively feminist, but I think it’s merely redressing an imbalance. Far too often, women in the movies are portrayed as inferior or inadequate. So if one movie comes along and upsets the status quo at the expense of men, I say so what? The sad truth is, we now live in an Outrage Culture, where people just want to get offended for the sake of it. Joss Whedon found out the hard way with his supposed mishandling of Black Widow in “Avengers: Age Of Ultron”. Those so-called feminists were wrong there, just as the male chauvinists are wrong about their view of how men are depicted here. In its own crazy way, “Fury Road” is celebrating the strength of women. The fact that it does so in an action movie makes it even more relevant.

So, it’s not enough for Miller to have crafted the most exhilarating cinematic experience in years. He’s also delivered something that stays with you long after the visual spectacle and the full-throttle weirdness has eased its hold. There aren’t many movies like that, and “Fury Road” is one of a kind. It could not have been made by any other filmmaker, simply because this is every inch George Miller at the height of his powers.

And sweet, gleeful madness.

 

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.9/5 (8 votes cast)

16 comments

  1. Starcrossed

    May 21, 2015 @ 11:48 am

    Fucking brilliant movie, that’s all I gotta say. Excellent review too.

  2. Bastion

    May 21, 2015 @ 3:45 pm

    Just saw this last nihgt and my brain is still recovering mwahhahahahah! Some of my frens didn’t like it. They say its too weird and they didn’t understand the story. Surprise to hear about this feminism issue as I didn’t notice any issues except like what you said the hero is 2nd best behind Charlize. She is damn cool man so she deserve it as the main hero. It reminds me of Aliens Ripley. Always admire your in-depth view of movies man it makes me want to see the movie again now hhahahahah

  3. Nigella Umbrella

    May 21, 2015 @ 9:08 pm

    Beautifully analyzed account of the film’s gender politics. So much of this has gone over the heads of armchair crusaders. You could ignore what Miller, who consulted with The Vagina Monologues’ Eve Ensler, has done here, and just go baying at the moon. Or you could meaningfully engage with the film on its own terms and provide counterpoints from the male angle. Or you could see it from someone else’s i.e. a woman’s. Then you might see that hey, sometimes, just sometimes, women are better than men, and that can include physical feats. So Miller did it in a Mad Max movie, does that invalidate Max as a smart, capable being? No it did not, as this review correctly pointed out it was just moments of playing second fiddle. Hardly a damnation of manhood.

  4. Seeing

    May 21, 2015 @ 9:08 pm

    Once again MAD MAXimum INTENSITY!!!

  5. Kerranngggg

    May 21, 2015 @ 11:48 pm

    ‘freakshow straight out of some S&M fetishist’s fever dream’ — took the words right out of my mouth. Great piece of writing mate. Best action movie of the year, bar none. Don’t even care if the year’s not even half-way done.

  6. Wai

    May 22, 2015 @ 12:53 pm

    Starcrossed: Thanks, glad you enjoyed the movie too. 🙂

    Bastion: I’m sure your brain will thank you later. Yes, Furiosa is truly an action heroine on the same lofty level as Ellen Ripley and Sarah Connor.

    Nigella Umbrella: Thank you for the kind words, and welcome to the site. Apparently, it was by sheer good timing that Miller managed to get Ensler. She happened to be in Africa when the shoot was ongoing, and Miller arranged for her to meet with the actresses who played the brides. As for the supposed “controversy”, it ultimately boils down to people making a mountain out of a molehill. Thanks for writing.

    Seeing: Indeed.

    Kerranngggg: First of all, love your nick. Second of all, glad the review is in tune with your thoughts. I think the year’s got a few more surprises in store, but yeah “Fury Road” is gonna be hard to top.

  7. Sane Shane

    May 22, 2015 @ 5:01 pm

    I thought the action was just so-so. Apart from the weird stuff, it’s nothing we haven’t really seen before in Hollywood. Seems like the studio over-indulged Miller’s excesses.

    One thing you’ve probably missed out in your analysis is that throughout the series Mad Max has always been the outsider wandering into other people’s stories. So I don’t think it’s about flipping any male action hero tropes here, or else it would’ve been the same case in the last 3 movies. Good attempt at giving it a different angle all the same.

  8. Son Of A Batman

    May 23, 2015 @ 4:45 am

    Entertaining read for a hugely entertaining movie. Is Tom Hardy the Feral Kid from Road Warrior? Could be he grew up and took the name of Max. Some theories been popping up on fan sites with strong evidence to back it up. Want to know your opinion on this.

    To the poster above just want to point out how wrong he/she is. Max was never an “outsider” in someone else’s story in the first Mad Max. It was all about how he became mad in the first place. Only in Road Warrior and Beyond Thunderdome they made him part of a larger world but he was still the anchor to everything that happened. In Fury Road, Max may’ve taken a back seat to Furiosa in some moments but in the end it’s him who came up with the plan to take back the Citadel. I’d say the whole movie is from his point of view. He even narrates the story for crying out loud.

  9. Wai

    May 25, 2015 @ 9:09 pm

    Sane Shane: Looks like Son Of A Batman beat me to the punch with what I wanted to say. As he pointed out, apart from “The Road Warrior” the central protagonist is indeed Max himself. In “Fury Road” he is as integral to the plot’s forward movement as Furiosa, at least from the 2nd act onwards. Besides, I did credit Furiosa as being the surprise protagonist of this film. Thanks for chiming in all the same.

    Son Of A Batman: To answer your question, no I don’t think this Max is the Feral Kid from “Road Warrior”. There’s ample evidence that he is the same Max as the Mel Gibson original, the most obvious being his backstory (losing his daughter), plus the leg brace he wears. Then there’s the simple fact that Miller initially intended the role to be played by Gibson, but for undisclosed reasons it ended up going to Hardy. Hope that clears it up. 🙂

  10. Julian Dellamorte

    May 26, 2015 @ 5:10 pm

    Agree with Nigella Umbrella. In your final few paragraphs, you pretty much summed up the real reason Mad Max Fury Road is a masterpiece. Personally, I find it does a whole lot of thematic heavy lifting while on the move. I don’t think I caught a single moment of outright exposition, at least not verbally. It’s so damned efficient in how it gives us all the information we need about the world, it’s people and their culture AND at the same time packs in this teardown of patriarchy and the 1-percenters. It’s such a dense and heady mix! By the time I left the theater I felt intoxicated, but in a good way. I also love the use of color, where other post-apocalyptic films are always going for the de-saturated look, Miller goes the opposite and cranks up the hues. Looks stunning.

    A sad sign of the times we live in now is that even the backlash has a counter-backlash. Misogynists had their rant, and now feminists, of all people, are attacking FR as not being feminist at all. The biggest buzz now being from Anita Sarkeesian (of the Gamergate debacle). She dismissed the film as an orgy of male violence and the women who participate in it not being good examples of female liberation but mere gender-swapped culprits in Hollywood’s endless glorification of violence. While some of her points are valid, she goes about it in a way that totally reeks of intellectual snobbishness. I’d like to draw your attention to a fantastic article that provides a well-argued rebuttal. If I may, I’ll post the link here. Don’t worry it’s not a self-promotion, hahaha…
    http://www.outlawvern.com/2015/05/22/righteous-fury/

  11. Caitlin Lensky

    May 27, 2015 @ 7:22 pm

    Anita Sarkeesian and her ilk are not true feminists. They’re just self-aggrandizing media whores lucky enough to have a soapbox to stand for the sheep to see her. There are reports of her ignoring fellow womanfolk in need of her aid even when she’s directly implored to use her considerable influence for real good. I consider myself a human being first and woman second and if that doesn’t qualify me as a true-blue feminist I could not care less. I enjoyed Fury Road as a top-notch example of what real creativity can result in when it’s unencumbered by studio meddling. It’s a great action movie that just happens to have strong male and female roles in it. I find it slightly sad that it’s getting all this flak that detracts people from its mind-boggling depth of detail. As the reviewer and some on the comments section have observed this film is insanely intricate with its world building yet it never stops to explain stuff to you. The world is presented as is and I find this incredibly refreshing.

  12. Wai

    May 28, 2015 @ 4:02 pm

    Julian, Caitlin: Thanks for chiming in. Apart from the Gamergate controversy, I don’t know quite enough about Sarkeesian to make any sort of informed comment on her. She does seem like someone with a skewed agenda though. And that article was a great read, thanks for drawing my attention to it! Also, totally agree on the film’s colour palette, it added to the whole vivid, crazy feel.

  13. Mr. Eko

    May 28, 2015 @ 8:54 pm

    Loved this movie. One long adrenaline rush to your eyeballs. Thumbs up with one hand and salute with d other!

  14. Wai

    June 1, 2015 @ 7:18 pm

    Mr. Eko: Good use of both your hands, sir.

  15. Yazs

    June 15, 2015 @ 4:41 pm

    Witness me! This movie is now one of my faves. Great review as always!

  16. Wai

    June 19, 2015 @ 7:07 am

    Yazs: Thanks! And witness you I shall. In fact, I will escort you to the gates of Valhalla myself!

Leave A Reply

By submitting a comment you grant www.electroshadow.com a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate and irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin’s discretion. Your email is used for verification purposes only, it will never be shared.